As the United Kingdom braces for its impending general election, the Labour Party, currently leading in the polls, has notably sidestepped substantial discourse on cryptocurrency. The party, favored to triumph, has offered scant commentary beyond vague aspirations to establish the country as a tokenization hub and endorse digital pound initiatives, leaving the future of crypto within the UK ambiguous.

The recent debate between Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Labour’s Keir Starmer was predominantly preoccupied with welfare, immigration, and the European Union, with crypto discussions conspicuously absent. Despite the Conservative government’s previous crypto-forward stances, their present manifesto, similar to those of Labour and the Liberal Democrats, remains silent on the subject.

Polling data from Ipsos reveals Labour’s substantial lead with 42% voter support, compared to the Conservatives’ 19%. Should these numbers hold, Starmer is poised to assume the premiership with a commanding parliamentary majority.

Also read: Prediction Markets Signal Biden’s Popular Vote Victory, But Trump Likely to Win Presidency

Laura Navaratnam, U.K. policy lead at the Crypto Council for Innovation, notes that Labour’s manifesto vaguely alludes to fostering a competitive environment and touches on the role of regulators but omits specific mentions of crypto. She perceives this neutrality as somewhat positive, given the absence of negative positions.

Labour’s focus, as outlined in their manifesto, centers on economic growth through substantial investments in supply chains, increasing neighborhood police presence, and reducing NHS waiting times.

Globally, crypto has remained a peripheral issue in elections across over 60 countries, including South Africa, Croatia, Finland, Lithuania, and France.

Navaratnam believes a Labour government may not necessarily impede the UK’s crypto ambitions. She anticipates that ongoing legislative efforts, particularly regarding stablecoins, could progress unimpeded.

Chainalysis’ Wain concurs, asserting that significant regulatory work, largely driven by governmental departments and the FCA, is unlikely to be abandoned irrespective of the election outcome. He emphasizes that the groundwork laid thus far is enduring and will not be easily dismissed.