Renewed movement from mt. Gox: $700m in bitcoin stirred, yet market remains steady

Renewed Movement from Mt. Gox: $700M in Bitcoin Stirred, Yet Market Remains Steady

Last Updated: August 22, 2024By

The specter of Mt. Gox, the long-defunct cryptocurrency exchange, may once again loom over the Bitcoin (BTC) market, with significant implications. On an early Wednesday, a notable movement was observed—an address linked to the collapsed platform transferred a substantial 13,265 BTC, an amount translating to approximately $784 million. Among this, a majority of 12,000 BTC found its way into a new address tagged “1PuQB,” as per insights from Arkham Intelligence, a prominent data-tracking platform.

Concurrently, the residual BTC made its way to the “1Jbez” address, which Arkham has earmarked as the cold wallet belonging to Mt. Gox. Even after this movement, the insolvent exchange retains over 46,000 BTC in its reserves.

The restitution process for Mt. Gox creditors has been a pivotal factor contributing to downward pressure on BTC’s price throughout the summer. Nevertheless, this latest flurry of on-chain activity may not result in a substantial market impact, according to Alex Thorn, the head of research at Galaxy Digital.

Also, read – Bitcoin Bear Trap? Goldman Sachs Warns of Misleading U.S. Jobs Report Amid Economic Uncertainty

Thorn elucidated on X, “We currently surmise that out of the 13,265 BTC shifted in this transaction, a mere 1,265 BTC (approximately $74.5 million) is designated for distribution, with the remaining 12,000 BTC likely destined for fresh cold storage within the estate—thus, the market impact may be minimal.”

In the aftermath of this transaction, Bitcoin’s price has remained relatively stable, hovering just above the $59,000 mark, as evidenced by data from CoinDesk.

Gif;base64,r0lgodlhaqabaaaaach5baekaaealaaaaaabaaeaaaictaeaow==

Get Blockchain Insights In Inbox

Stay ahead of the curve with expert analysis and market updates.

About the Author: Eunji Lim

Eunji lim

Disclaimer: Any post shared by a third-party agency are sponsored and Blockchain Magazine has no views on any such posts. The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the clients and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blockchain Magazine. The information provided in this post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial, investment, or professional advice. Blockchain Magazine does not endorse or promote any specific products, services, or companies mentioned in this posts. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions.