Is decentralized internet a possible reality?

Is Decentralized Internet a Possible Reality?

Last Updated: March 15, 2022By

 

On HBO’s T.V. series Silicon Valley, startups promise to “change the world” by tackling silly, often nonexistent problems, providing a sarcastic view of the startup industry. But this season, the show’s characters are tackling a project that really could make a difference. In their latest pivot (a second pivot for the company), Richard Hendricks and the Pied Piper gang are creating a new internet that cuts out intermediaries like Facebook, Google, and the fictional Hooli. Their idea: Use a peer-to-peer network built atop every smartphone on the planet by using a part of unused processing power present in the device, effectively rendering massive data centers full of servers unnecessary.

Richard Hendricks wanted to build a completely decentralized version of our current internet without firewalls, tolls, government regulation, spying. The information would be accessible in every sense of the word.

This fictional idea is quite romantic and far from realization, but what if I say the decentralized internet part of the story is worked upon right now and is quite possibly be realized. Thanks to blockchain technology, this is possible.

We’re closer than we’ve ever been. The technology is finally catching up to the dreams painstakingly sketched in whitepapers from the 60s to the 90s. We have computers like Diffie-Hellman key exchange that are very fast, where you get a secret key transmitted over an open, vulnerable network, which is dirt cheap. RSA is no longer as costly as it used to be. At the same time, I’m pretty terrified of what’s to come.

With politicians like Elizabeth Warren threatening to break up tech monopolies, just as Standard Oil and Ma Bell were broken up in previous generations (Which certainly seems very hard and purely fictional these days, to be honest). In order to break these centralized giants, there will be a need for an alternative, which is more likely now than ever to be decentralized.

But the regulators are not our friends. While in a trusted position, regulators are a group of humans and are susceptible to corruption, viciousness, and evil like all humans. I’m not saying the government is evil, just that with great powers comes significant responsibilities, but the regulators aren’t some Avengers. There’s always going to be some misuse of these powers.

Also, read – The myths associated with Blockchain. Demisting few.

So what do I mean by decentralized Blockchain internet is closer than you think?

I think things are going to come to a head. The internet will hold so much information, or software will kill so many people due to human mistakes in the code that regulators will have to step in out of their very responsibility. What will we do in that scenario?

But we do have a few options. We can accept whatever regulation the legislators pass and hope they understand the technology well enough to make the law correctly. We can create our self-regulation so legislators will borrow concepts and legal language from the existing frameworks. Or, people will go underground.

It’s ultimately better to have a decentralized network. It’s much closer to what we do in real life. At least, as per my view, trust and reputation systems in a decentralized network would ideally derive from the way people interact. If I know Poojan, and Poojan knows Sanket, and Sanket knows Vignesh, I might be able to talk to Vignesh, but I wouldn’t trust him as much as Sanket, and I wouldn’t trust Sanket as much as Poojan, and so on. Through continuous interaction, we gain trust, but as they say, “trust is earned in drops and lost in buckets.”

I don’t want to turn it into a rant, but my point is this: decentralized networks are closer than you think. They’re growing under the surface, waiting for the right time, the right place. The possibilities are laid out before us.

 

Issues with Blockchain Internet

Many individuals have assumed that because of the arrival of global public blockchains like Bitcoin, every Blockchain is a general fact. However, this is one of the most common Blockchain myths that can perplex newcomers. Public blockchains aren’t the only sort of Blockchain available. Private and hybrid blockchains are also appropriate for a variety of applications.

The launch of Bitcoin triggered a unique phenomenon that affected all financial institutions and individual businesses. Permissioned Blockchain, often known as federated or private Blockchain, is the name given to this phenomenon. Many of the distributed ledger technologies in use today are examples of various sorts of Blockchain. So there’s one myth out of the way.

Stay informed with daily updates from Blockchain Magazine on Google News. Click here to follow us and mark as favorite: [Blockchain Magazine on Google News].

Gif;base64,r0lgodlhaqabaaaaach5baekaaealaaaaaabaaeaaaictaeaow==

Get Blockchain Insights In Inbox

Stay ahead of the curve with expert analysis and market updates.

Disclaimer: Any post shared by a third-party agency are sponsored and Blockchain Magazine has no views on any such posts. The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the clients and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blockchain Magazine. The information provided in this post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial, investment, or professional advice. Blockchain Magazine does not endorse or promote any specific products, services, or companies mentioned in this posts. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions.

About the Author: Editor's Desk

Avatar